Zoology and the like I think are, because hypothetical prediction inherently implies classification.
And, of course, make good pictures. Nor is the notion that rape is bad an example of state coercion. The dilemma is that when individuals pursue personal gain, the net result for society as a whole may be impoverishment.
When the facts or events are given, anyone can interpret them, and the fact that these events are known can mask the relative merits of the theory which interprets them. His country is overstretched, losing economic momentum, losing world leadership, and losing the philosophical plot. Conversely, if a hypotheis is corroborated with a positive answer, the theories behind it stand validated until a hypothesis receives a negative answer.
The goal is not a description which is true or corresponds to the truth, or at least that is not the immediate goal.
On the face of it, it might be surprising that the set of rotations of three space should itself look anything like three space. The primitive language-game which children are taught needs no justification; attempts at justification need to be rejected. Every hypothesis, in essence, is a prediction about the future. So it is an element of science, but incomplete. In it I tried to argue that there are some fundamental problems involved in conceptualizing time which, in my mind, appear intractable, and hence its existence as a concept contradictory, impossible.
And certainly conjugating by a point is the same as conjugating by its antipodal point, since the minus signs will cancel eachother in the latter case.
Forgetting is necessary to free ourselves from imperfectly understood "lessons of history," so that we can see the challenges ahead clearly, without preconceptions or prejudice.
But in reality the sameness of the universe upon which science is predicated is not a a sameness at any particular moment, but rather a sameness of behavior.
Of course Einstein is justly famed for, among many other things, pioneering the idea of space-time.
For if what we now call by that name became the rule, the game in which they were false moves would have been abrogated. Do this with every single point on the sphere, each point and its antipodal point meeting each other but meeting no other points. I think that that is neither true nor a good value. And, of course, make good pictures. In it I tried to argue that there are some fundamental problems involved in conceptualizing time which, in my mind, appear intractable, and hence its existence as a concept contradictory, impossible. In failing to recognize this, we find ourselves unable to express the explanations we seek. To which it was replied that of course time has an existence, as a social convention, a mental framework. Obviously, this is a handy thing to have a grasp on and this is why we care about special orthogonal matrices.
If it were, we could have basically stopped after the Greeks figured out a fair amount of geometry.
That is not agreement in opinions but in form of life. For if what we now call by that name became the rule, the game in which they were false moves would have been abrogated. Without the steady march of time, this unity of behavior disappears, and there are simply a million disparate entities.
Zoology and the like I think are, because hypothetical prediction inherently implies classification. in our society, the State.