[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: split-fancy-with-parent
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: split-fancy-with-parent |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:17:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:41:38 +0800 Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
wrote:
EA> Vincent Beffara <vbeffara@ens-lyon.fr> writes:
>>>> Invariably when I run "B t" gnus tells me "this message would be
>>>> split to INBOX" (but the "(: nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent)" does
>>>> appear in the window). What am I missing here ?
>>
EA> I don't know if what you're doing is supposed to work or not, but
EA> I'm also using the registry, and I use (:
EA> gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent). That works nicely. I'm using
EA> No Gnus, though, don't know if this is a newly-introduced function…
>>
>> I tried that as well, and the behavior is exactly the same, that line
>> seems to be completely ignored ... BTW, using No Gnus as well (from the
>> git repository).
EA> I'm very much the last person who should be tackling any else's gnus
EA> problems, but I'm thinking that since you're using imap, you should be
EA> setting =nnimap-split-fancy=, not =nnml-split-fancy=. That variable is
EA> mentioned in the docs for =gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent=, but
EA> nowhere else, so I'm going to bow out here before I give any
EA> particularly dumb advice :)
The split rules changed in recent versions of No Gnus. I think they are
only a server parameter now, so you have to modify your server
definition.
The `gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent' documentation is wrong
(outdated, really). Sorry about that. I'm pretty sure you don't want
`nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent' though.
Ted
- split-fancy-with-parent, Vincent Beffara, 2011/03/22
- Re: split-fancy-with-parent, Eric Abrahamsen, 2011/03/22
- Re: split-fancy-with-parent, Vincent Beffara, 2011/03/23
- Re: split-fancy-with-parent, Eric Abrahamsen, 2011/03/23
- Message not available
- Re: split-fancy-with-parent,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: split-fancy-with-parent, Vincent Beffara, 2011/03/23
- Message not available
- Re: split-fancy-with-parent, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/23
- Re: split-fancy-with-parent, Vincent Beffara, 2011/03/24
- Message not available
- Re: split-fancy-with-parent, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/03/29
- Re: split-fancy-with-parent, Vincent Beffara, 2011/03/30