[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Info-stow] texi2any vs texi2html
From: |
Adam Spiers |
Subject: |
Re: [Info-stow] texi2any vs texi2html |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:36:44 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:59:12PM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> Why not simply use texi2any?
That's what I said at the bottom of my previous email. It will
probably require some work to convert though. Help with that is very
welcome.
> Don't bother of SuSE at all.
Well, since I work for SUSE[1], you'll have to forgive me for saying
that I'm not going to follow that advice :-)
[1] Note the capitalization; the lower-case 'u' was dropped some time
around 2004.
- Re: [Info-stow] [Stow-devel] GNU Stow 2.2.2 released, Adam Spiers, 2016/11/11
- Re: [Info-stow] [Stow-devel] GNU Stow 2.2.2 released, Jean Louis, 2016/11/12
- Re: [Info-stow] [Stow-devel] GNU Stow 2.2.2 released, Erik Falor, 2016/11/13
- Re: [Info-stow] [Stow-devel] GNU Stow 2.2.2 released, Jean Louis, 2016/11/13
- Re: [Info-stow] [Stow-devel] GNU Stow 2.2.2 released, Adam Spiers, 2016/11/20
- Re: [Info-stow] [Stow-devel] GNU Stow 2.2.2 released, Jean Louis, 2016/11/20
- Re: [Info-stow] texi2any vs texi2html,
Adam Spiers <=
- Re: [Info-stow] texi2any vs texi2html, Jean Louis, 2016/11/21
- Re: [Info-stow] *SUSE (was: texi2any vs texi2html), Adam Spiers, 2016/11/21
- Re: [Info-stow] *SUSE (was: texi2any vs texi2html), Jean Louis, 2016/11/21
- Re: [Info-stow] Stow use cases (was: *SUSE), Adam Spiers, 2016/11/21
- Re: [Info-stow] Stow use cases (was: *SUSE), Jean Louis, 2016/11/21