[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] Lambda lists
|
From: |
Charles Turner |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] Lambda lists |
|
Date: |
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:18:55 +0000 |
On 4 March 2013 08:17, Per Bothner <address@hidden> wrote:
> Any reason why OrdinaryLambda.java isn't in gnu/commonlisp/lang?
> Thata's where other CL-specific syntax is. And the ELisp version
> of lambda is likewise in the jemacs-specific package gnu.jemacs.lang.
No, I've changed that in the attached patch.
> Actually, I don't think this is a big patch. It does seem to
> duplicate some of the logic in Lambda.java, which isn't ideal,
> but it doesn't seem too bad.
It could be better. The refactoring isn't straightforward though. I
did have a go at this before, but Lambda#rewriteFormals would have to
completely changed to accommodate the refactoring, which I didn't
think was worth doing given the relatively little duplication for now.
There were some mistakes in the last patch I sent (I forgot to attach
the changes to CommonLisp). This patch also contains a testsuite which
exhibits some of the most obvious bugs.
Charles.
lambda.patch
Description: Binary data