[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] Trusted hardware
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: [OT] Trusted hardware |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:30:50 -0400 |
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 21:19 +0200, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
> Can you please clarify what you mean by "supervisor-mode hole" and/or give
> some examples of such processor errata?
I mean "mechanisms by which user mode code can enter supervisor mode."
No, I cannot give examples. Intel is very careful about the NDAs on this
information, and after watching the difficulties that Robert Collins had
to deal with, I have always refused to sign these NDAs. And so, of
course, if I now disclosed any of this I would be subject to prosecution
and prison for information theft.
Which would at least give me plenty of time to get Coyotos working. :-)
shap
- Re: capability interface for idl4, (continued)
- Re: capability interface for idl4, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/07
- Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/07
- Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/07
- Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/07
- Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/07
- Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/10
- Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/10
- [OT] Trusted hardware, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/10
- Re: [OT] Trusted hardware, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/10
- Re: [OT] Trusted hardware, Udo A. Steinberg, 2005/10/10
- Re: [OT] Trusted hardware,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: [OT] Trusted hardware, Udo A. Steinberg, 2005/10/10
- Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/07
- Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/07
Re: capability interface for idl4, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/07