|
From: | ness |
Subject: | Re: Hurdish applications for persistence |
Date: | Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:18:21 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050813) |
address@hidden wrote:
Well, if so, why do we even implement parts of POSIX? I could imagine some sort of much nicer std, with OO and cool bindings for c++ (or only in c++, without c; this is sth. funny, actually: we have a kernel in c++ and the rest of the os in c...).They _shouldn't_! Why do we have standards like POSIX. This is the GNU system, not the POSIX system. And POSIX isn't the law.
-- -ness-
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |