Re: Extending the problems we have with caps to endpoints

[Jonathan S. Shapiro]

On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 14:39 +0200, ness wrote:
> As endpoints are mappable objects in upcoming L4s, we have the same 
> problems like with capabilities, IMHO. Maybye it's not that important, 
> as endpoints aren't exchanged that often, but I guess we needed an 
> endpoint server, too?
> One more point to hope for copy semantics or to emulate 'em?

Yes, there *does* appear to be a reductio problem here, doesn't there. I
rejected REVOKABLE COPY for other reasons before I got around to
noticing this issue.

Thanks!

shap