[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Name spaces in programming languages
|
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
|
Subject: |
Re: Name spaces in programming languages |
|
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:25:30 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Dear Alfred,
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <address@hidden> writes:
> In Guile, that is _one_ implementation of a million.
As usual, you failed to quote the relevant part of the email you're
replying to. That is very unfortunate because it makes it next to
impossible to seriously discuss a specific technical issue with you.
In particular, you missed my point on functional languages. Too bad.
> (oh, and I consider Scheme broken in many regards, but that is for
> another thread)
Go ahead: comp.lang.scheme.
Ludovic.
- Re: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, (continued)
- Re: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Message not available
- Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Brian Brunswick, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Brian Brunswick, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Name spaces in programming languages, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/27
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/28
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/28
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/28
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
Re: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27