[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Coyotos vs. EROS
|
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
|
Subject: |
Re: Coyotos vs. EROS |
|
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:36:03 -0400 |
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 14:31 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> The endpoint is the kernel object for which you get a receive or send
> capability.
>
> So, there is another level of indirection in the IPC path. But it can
> not really be avoided, at least on the sender side.
Actually, it turns out that this isn't really another level of
indirection. The queue exists already, The only question is whether it
is named directly (as a first-class object) or indirectly (as part of
the receiver process state).
shap