[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Performance
|
From: |
Pierre THIERRY |
|
Subject: |
Re: Performance |
|
Date: |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:58:29 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
Scribit Michal Suchanek dies 24/04/2006 hora 11:07:
> There are quite a few counterexamples. For one, Windows 98 are much
> faster on common hardware than Windows 2000 or XP. Yet there is large
> user base for the later because of much better stability.
I'm not sure if it is the real explanation of their user base. They are
above all installed and selled on new systems, and these systems are
just more recent and thus faster than the average system on which 98/ME
are used.
So there is a user base because user don't really have choice (or think
they have not) and the performance problem did not seem to me to be
really perceived by users.
Monopolisticly,
Nowhere man
--
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature