[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive
From: |
Eric Northup |
Subject: |
Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:13:29 -0400 |
On Jun 7, 2006, at 5:48 AM, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Right. And there is nothing wrong with this in principle (except that
> mechanism are needed in the system that I'd like to avoid, but
> that's a choice
> I make).
Can you clarify: do you object to the mechanisms themselves, or to
the use of these mechanisms to deny (human!) users freedom?
-Eric
- Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, (continued)
- Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Bas Wijnen, 2006/06/06
- Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/06/07
- Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Bas Wijnen, 2006/06/07
- Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/06/07
- Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Bas Wijnen, 2006/06/07
- Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/06/07
- Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Bas Wijnen, 2006/06/08
- Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/06/07
Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/06/07
Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/06/07
Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/06/07
Re: Confinement (even with TPMs) and DRM are not mutually exclusive, Bas Wijnen, 2006/06/07