[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Translucency counterexample
From: |
Pierre THIERRY |
Subject: |
Re: Translucency counterexample |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:23:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Scribit Anton Tagunov dies 12/01/2007 hora 12:22:
> If any process is able to check "identity" of other process it can
> refuse to work with replacement implementation right?
For that it needs to receive appropriate authority, so if the program is
installed in a way that it receives such bootstrapping trust information
by it's parent that gives him a capability to the alternative
implementation, it won't be able to tell it's not the original, AFAICT.
Supposedly,
Pierre
--
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature