On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Stephen Kell
<address@hidden> wrote:
> The test currently is that if there are no data tracks we consider cd audio.
> What would
> be a better test? If there is only one data track after all of the audio
> tracks?
I'd say if there are *any* audio tracks, it's worth doing a CDDB lookup.
Sometimes the order is reversed, e.g. game CDs that have a red-book
audio soundtrack after the track with the game data. Sometimes there
are even multiple data tracks (e.g. one for Mac, one for Windows).
Ok. It sounds like you've got a good idea of what you'd expect to see. If this is correct, then
probably it would be best for you to work something that meets your expectations.
If there's a question or a coding problem you have, I can probably help out.
> What would be very helpful is to remaster this CD to make it not proprietary
> so we
> have a sample test to work with. For example you could burn this to an image
> and then
> make the wav part be 1 second of silence. If the data part has copyrighted
> text, change the text.
> We want to keep the *structure* of the CD image to be about the same. The
> content can be totally different.
Cool -- should be no trouble. I'll post back in a couple of days. I can
probably provide a few more test cases too, for other kinds of
data/audio hybrid.
Thanks!
No - thank you!
Stephen