[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering
From: |
Fabio Pesari |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:42:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 |
On 02/10/2016 01:06 AM, arthur_torrey@comcast.net wrote:
> This seems like something that MIGHT be helped, or at least encouraged, by
> the folks in the "Digital Right to Repair" movement. They are trying to
> produce a legal REQUIREMENT that companies release the information needed for
> outside entities to service their products to the same extent that an
> in-house entity would. I don't know that this would drill down far enough to
> require releasing signing keys, but one might be able to make a case for
> it.... If nothing else it would make it harder to block efforts to crack the
> signature...
Do you mean http://repair.org/ ? I agree. I think the FSF should
approach them.
> That said, there is the Open Source Hardware Association
> http://www.oshwa.org/ that does in some ways try to do the equivalent of the
> FSF...
Thanks. I think their name along makes collaboration with the FSF
unlikely, too bad. I think the emphasis should be on freedom and on
hardware designs rather than actual hardware: those can be copyrighted
just fine.
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering, Tobias Platen, 2016/02/06
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering, arthur_torrey, 2016/02/09
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering,
Fabio Pesari <=
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering, arthur_torrey, 2016/02/09
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Reverse Engineering, arthur_torrey, 2016/02/10