Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Potential of the Sleepycat License

[Ineiev]

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:39:13PM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> LGPL is copyleft, but the copyleft "preservation" part is required
> mainly when the user makes changes to the original (LGPL'd) work
> *itself*, this is why it's a weak copyleft license, while a simple
> dependency on the LGPL'd work wouldn't need to carry the same or
> compatible license (unless if statically linked, if I'm not mistaken).

And for statically linked applications, the LGPLv3 provides
the 4d0 option.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature