[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
2001-04-03-gvv-ltdl-linebuffer.patch [Was Re: FYI: duplicate removal pat
From: |
Gary V . Vaughan |
Subject: |
2001-04-03-gvv-ltdl-linebuffer.patch [Was Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates]] |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 00:20:14 +0100 |
On Monday 02 April 2001 12:26 pm, Nick Hudson wrote:
> Michael Matz wrote:
> > Argh, This then again means, that libtool will probably generate
> > excessively large link commands for KDE. We sometimes list also
> > dependent libs in the makefiles (history and lazyness), and this then
> > cumulates over many libraries. Hmm, OK I need to check, if this really
> > is so, but I suspect it.
>
> I can confirm this. Some .la files created by NetBSD KDE 2 pkgs have
> dependency_libs entries that are bigger than 2048 characters long. ATM,
> the buffer in ltdl.c is currently set to 1024.
Eeek. That is not the GNU way! The attached patch fixes this problem. Okay
to commit?
Cheers,
Gary.
--
___ _ ___ __ _ mailto: address@hidden
/ __|__ _ _ ___ _| | / / | / /_ _ _ _ __ _| |_ __ _ ___ address@hidden
| (_ / _` | '_|// / |/ /| |/ / _` | || / _` | ' \/ _` | _ \
\___\__,_|_|\_, /|___(_)___/\__,_|\_,_\__, |_||_\__,_|//_/
home page: /___/ /___/ gpg public key:
http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc
2001-04-03-gvv-ltdl-linebuffer.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates], (continued)
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates], Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/01
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates], Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/04/01
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates], Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/01
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates], Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/04/01
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Nick Hudson, 2001/04/02
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Robert Boehne, 2001/04/03
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/04/03
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Michael Matz, 2001/04/03
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/04
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/04/05
- 2001-04-03-gvv-ltdl-linebuffer.patch [Was Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates]],
Gary V . Vaughan <=
- Re: 2001-04-03-gvv-ltdl-linebuffer.patch [Was Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates]], Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/04
Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates], Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/01