Re: PATCH: autoconf 2.50 support

[Gary V . Vaughan]

On Thursday 28 June 2001 11:12 pm, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> 2001-06-28  Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>, Gary V. Vaughan 
> <address@hidden>
>
>       Libtool now builds with the help of Autoconf-2.50!
>       * configure.ac (AC_PREREQ):  Require Autoconf-2.50 or newer.
>       (AC_PROG_CPP, AC_EXEEXT, AC_OBJEXT):  Removed.  Autoconf-2.50
>       doesn't have the AC_REQUIRE bug that required these to be called
>       explicitly from here.  Autoconf-2.50 uses this file instead of...
>       * configure.in: ...this, which is now deleted.
>       * cdemo/configure.ac, cdemo/configure.in: Ditto.
>       * demo/configure.ac, demo/configure.in: Ditto.
>       * depdemo/configure.ac, depdemo/configure.in: Ditto.
>       * libltdl/configure.ac, libltdl/configure.in: Ditto.
>       * mdemo/configure.ac, mdemo/configure.in: Ditto.
>       * pdemo/configure.ac, pdemo/configure.in: Ditto.
>       * libltdl/acconfig.h:  Deleted.
>       * Makefile.am (libtool): libtool now depends on configure.ac.
>       * libtool.m4 (_LT_AC_LOCK):  Use 2.50's AC_LANG_PUSH/AC_LANG_POP
>       instead of 2.13's AC_LANG_SAVE/AC_LANG_RESTORE.
>       (AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_C_CONFIG): Ditto.
>       (AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_CXX_CONFIG): Ditto.
>       * libtoolize.in:  Use $configure_ac, instead of hardcoding
>       configure.in.

Doh! I forgot:

        * tagdemo/configure.ac, tagdemo/configure.in: Ditto.


Committing now.


Project of the week
===================

If anyone would like a nice project for the weekend, I'd love to receive a 
patch to move the code for generating the libtool script into config.status 
(with a liberal sprinkling of autoconf-2.50's AC_CONFIG_FILES macro).

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
  ())_.  Gary V. Vaughan     gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
  ( '/   Research Scientist  http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk        ,_())____
  / )=   GNU Hacker          http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool   \'      `&
`(_~)_   Tech' Author        http://sources.redhat.com/autobook    =`---d__/