Re: [Fwd: ltmain.in]

[postmaster]

address@hidden wrote:
> 
> I found that freebsd is hacking all the ltmain.sh-es to get
> roughly the same behavior that netbsd is already getting.
> Any objections to putting something along these lines into
> ltmain.in?  (Obviously changing /usr/bin/false to something
> conditional on not being freebsd.)

Looks good to me.  Please apply the same change to all live branches though!

Cheers,
        Gary.

> > --- config/ltmain.sh.orig       Mon Sep  3 18:24:41 2001
> > +++ config/ltmain.sh    Thu Dec  6 03:24:42 2001
> > @@ -2408,6 +2408,9 @@
> >           *-*-netbsd*)
> >             # Don't link with libc until the a.out ld.so is fixed.
> >             ;;
> > +         *-*-freebsd*)
> > +           # FreeBSD doesn't need this...
> > +           ;;
> >           *)
> >             # Add libc to deplibs on all other systems if necessary.
> >             if test $build_libtool_need_lc = "yes"; then
> > @@ -4175,10 +4178,12 @@
> >         fi
> > 
> >         # Install the pseudo-library for information purposes.
> > +       if /usr/bin/false; then
> >         name=`$echo "X$file" | $Xsed -e 's%^.*/%%'`
> >         instname="$dir/$name"i
> >         $show "$install_prog $instname $destdir/$name"
> >         $run eval "$install_prog $instname $destdir/$name" || exit $?
> > +       fi
> > 
> >         # Maybe install the static library, too.
> >         test -n "$old_library" && staticlibs="$staticlibs
> > $dir/$old_library"