[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a]
From: |
Robert Boehne |
Subject: |
Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a] |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:00:18 -0600 |
All,
Hey, that's a relief, now we don't have to deal with this
issue anymore. I would be in favor of a) leaving the
shell functions in place, and b) making use of them more.
Thanks,
Robert
Bruce Korb wrote:
>
> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>
> > Bruce> ... 20 year old shells are [not] too old for continued
> > Bruce> support. Ick. How completely disgusting.
> >
> > Cheer up and read the Autoconf 2.54c announcement entirely :)
>
> You're right. I only read the first 100 lines or so. :-)
> This is a decade overdue. ;-) But still, at the usual
> release rate, libtool's use is still over the horizon. :-(
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool-patches mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool-patches
- [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included . a], Boehne, Robert, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included .a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included .a], Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a],
Robert Boehne <=
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Akim Demaille, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], akim, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Akim Demaille, 2002/11/15
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Tom Lord, 2002/11/15
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Charles Wilson, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Tom Lord, 2002/11/14
- Re: tabularized libtool, Bruce Korb, 2002/11/14