|
From: | Charles Wilson |
Subject: | Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results |
Date: | Sat, 09 Oct 2004 22:07:17 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 MultiZilla/1.6.4.0b |
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Charles Wilson wrote:Further, why is "demo-make.test" a prereq for "pdemo-inst.test"?Making the following changes allow pdemo-exec and pdemo-inst to work on cygwin:This patch is now applied to branch-2-0 and head. It did reduce the number of failed tests observed under Cygwin and MinGW.
Something wierd happened with the pdemo-inst patch. The following change happened:
-func_require "demo-make" "demo/hell$EXEEXT" +func_require "pdemo-make" "demo/hell$EXEEXT" But the patch I sent in was -func_require "demo-make" "demo/hell$EXEEXT" +func_require "pdemo-make" "pdemo/hell$EXEEXT"E.g. there were two "demo" to "pdemo" changes in the same line, not just one.
-- Chuck
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |