libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cleaning up libtool.m4, ltdl.m4 and configure.ac


From: Dalibor Topic
Subject: Re: Cleaning up libtool.m4, ltdl.m4 and configure.ac
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:27:56 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Debian/1.7.5-1

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

Hallo Ralf,

We advertise Autoconf-2.50 and Automake-1.4 compatibility within
branch-1-5.  branch-2-0 does not do that any more, neither has it (most
of) your warnings.  IIRC there was only one left and it could only be
solved with CVS autoconf, not sure ATM.

Great! Thanks a lot, that's excellent news, making me look happily forward to 2.0. :)

Unfortunately, while it is possible to simply autoupdate configure.ac and ltdl.m4 (by calling it configure.ac) [1], it is not possible to autoupdate libtool.m4 as the hacks around the lack of support for the java language in autoconf seem to whack autoupdate into some endless m4 loop. Well, at least 17 h long loop that I chose to terminate this morning :)


This is a bug.  Could you please post a recipe to reproduce it so we may
at least find out which tool (M4, Autoconf, Automake, Libtool) is buggy?

Sure. Get libtool 1.5.16-tar.gz. In libtool 1.5.16 source code dir:

mkdir break-autoupdate && cp libtool.m4 break-autoupdate/configure.ac && cd break-autoupdate && autoupdate

The definition of what constitues a bug fix is being bent ways at times,
but if you ask me, no such reordering should take place, be it only
because then we'd have to increase libtool.m4's serial which then made
the universe collapse because our serial numbering would break.  :->

That's a pretty good reason, I wouldn't want the universe to collapse :)

Please look at branch-2-0 or even HEAD if you consider involved changes.

I think I'll wait for 2.0 to see if making such involved changes makes sense any more. It sounds like 2.0 will solve my main pedantic -Wall warning gripe, anyway, so ...

cheers,
dalibor topic





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]