[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fixlet for missing braces around sys_search_path
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Fixlet for missing braces around sys_search_path |
Date: |
Mon, 2 May 2005 15:05:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hi Riccardo, Dalibor,
* Dalibor Topic wrote on Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 06:30:16PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >We're back here again. Stepan Kasal made it clear to me (on the
> >autoconf-patches list) that this change:
> >| < AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(LTDL_SYSSEARCHPATH, "$sys_search_path",
> >| ---
> >| > AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(LTDL_SYSSEARCHPATH, ["$sys_search_path"],
> >
> >could not possibly have fixed anything. :-/
> >
> >So, since I would just suspect some latent bug in Libtool: what was your
> >real problem?
>
> Hmm, good question. It was checked in[1] more than a year ago though,
> and I can't find the original bug report.
That's really a long time. Note to everyone using libtool: if you have
patches which are generally useful, please post them here so we can
discuss and eventually incorporate them.
Having less different libtool versions floating around is better.
(/me also waves to Daniel Reed with a big "excuse me" for having let
work on the lib/lib64 issue slide.)
> IRC channels are a bad place for bug reports :(
ACK.
> I believe it was a failure in libtool on some of the
> more bizarre platforms, like sparc-opensbd.
Hmm.
> If you are interested in having libtool tested on bizarre platforms, I
> suggest asking Riccardo to do a round of make checking 1.5.16.
Riccardo: could you be bothered to do so? If you test libtool itself,
using 1.5.16 is fine. If you decide to test a package that uses
libltdl, please wait for 1.5.18 or use branch-1-5 from CVS.
Of course, testing the other branches would be great as well, but please
wait for the next 2.0 alpha then.
Regards,
Ralf
> [1] http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2004-March/097374.html