Re: [patch 01/19] 277-gary-rename-remaining-troublesome-ltdl-apis.diff Queue

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Gary,

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:36:00AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > 
> >Please also apply the then-freed part of your patch queue,
> 
> Before 277, I have (see my patch queue status mail from last Tue):

Gah, I've been unaware of the fact that your patch queue mail *is*
sorted.  D'oh.

> - patches/302-gary-libtoolize-config.diff
> 
>   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-10/msg00115.html
>   review pending

Will do next.

> >that should 284, 285, 286 I believe;
> 
> After 302 is cleared to apply, that will unblock 277, 284 and 285.
> 286 will then still be blocked by:
> 
> + patches/303-gary-correct-included-file-matching-expression.diff
> 
>   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-10/msg00147.html
>   review pending

OK, that one was my "next" before you wrote this, thinking it could come
right after 285.

> I might be able to apply the patches out of order, but I don't trust
> myself to do a careful enough interdependency analysis --  plus I
> already did extensive testing in the order they are queued, and it
> seems like unnecessary additional work to retest everything after
> twiddling the order when we need them all to go in to fix outstanding
> known bugs in HEAD anyway.  Hope that isn't too much of a pain for
> you...

No, that's fine.  I just need a week to address a few issues after your
queue is flushed.

Cheers,
Ralf