Re: misleading note in libtool header

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Gary,

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:56:06PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > So really my comment is about the `GNU' only.  The patch below should
> > cater for this.  OK to apply?
> 
> Comments inline below.  Otherwise, yes please! :-)  Another nice catch btw!

Thanks!

> >         * configure.ac (AC_INIT): Change the `PACKAGE' argument to be
> >         `GNU libtool' instead of `libtool'.
>                ^^
> 
> I'm with Akim here:  The package is called 'GNU Libtool', and the program
> is called 'libtool'.

Yeah.  I'm with you two, too, here.  I actually *meant* to change this
as well, but forgot to then.  :-/

HOWEVER.  It changes what we put in .lo and .la files.  It changes what
func_lalib_p looks for when it tries to match .la files.  Bad bad bad.
And because I have no desire to debug that code *now*, I'm withdrawing
the patch, and actually opposing it pre 2.0.

I hope you don't mind.

Sorry,
Ralf