[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc: foo.lo really is not the PIC object
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: doc: foo.lo really is not the PIC object |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:02:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi Bob,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:08:30AM CET:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >OK to apply? This patch turned up a couple of new entries in our TODO
> >list unfortunately. :-/
>
> Looks good to apply!
Applied. Thanks!
Cheers,
Ralf
> > * doc/libtool.texi (Implementation issues): Note that both
> > prefix and suffix of a library may differ.
> > (Using libtool, Creating object files, Linking libraries):
> > Remove last documentation traces of the age when `foo.lo' was
> > the PIC object file and not the `libtool object' text file.
> > (libtool script contents) <compiler_o_lo>: Remove description
> > of this variable. It was removed from libtool in 1.5 times.