libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:11:11 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:48:14PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >>>   * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LINKER_OPTION): Require
> >>>   _LT_DECL_SED.
> >>>   (_LT_CMD_GLOBAL_SYMBOLS, _LT_LINKER_SHLIBS): Likewise.
> >>>   * libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 (LTDL_INIT): Likewise.
> >>>   Report by Eric Blake.
> >        (_LT_DECL_SED): Set $Xsed here, using $SED.  Moved from...
> >        (_LT_SETUP): ...here.
> 
> All the more evidence for a nice automated check! :-)

I don't think so.  Let's make it less unnecessary automation for once.
Less factorization, less requirements stuff; after all, there is IMHO no
need to factorize unless the stuff is actually supposed to possibly used
in different combinations.  But I've ranted about AC_REQUIRE/m4_require
and Libtool macros before, enough of that now...

> Looks good.  Please go ahead.

Thanks!  Applied.

Cheers,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]