[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: distchecking without FC?
From: |
Noah Misch |
Subject: |
Re: distchecking without FC? |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 04:48:27 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:50:41PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Noah Misch wrote:
> >
> >`make dist' now works fine on a system with no Fortran. The list of files
> >in
> >the distribution has not changed.
> Normally I would be more in favor of narrowing the scope of management
> to as close to the file as possible. However, an order of magnitude
> speed improvement sounds great to me and the tests directories have
> certainly been burdensome. Presumably there is a substantial speed
> improvement while bootstrapping and configuring the project as well.
The subdirectory configures would still exist; bootstrap and test would take the
same amount of time. `make dist' will no longer need to configure the test
directories, so that part does improve.
- distchecking without FC?, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/06/14
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Noah Misch, 2007/06/14
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/06/14
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/06/15
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/06/16
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Noah Misch, 2007/06/17
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Noah Misch, 2007/06/18
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/06/19
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Noah Misch, 2007/06/19
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/06/19
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Noah Misch, 2007/06/21
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/06/21
- Re: distchecking without FC?, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/06/21