Re: versioning test

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Mike Gorchak wrote on Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:20:56AM CET:
> RW> libtool does not take care to rename duplicate object members in
> RW> archives on your system.  Let's find out whether this is due to a
> RW> deficient "sort" binary or func_basename on QNX:  please cd into your
> RW> build tree in which you ran the testsuite.  Then enter these commands
> RW> and post all their output (gzip large output):
>
> RW>   cd tests/testsuite.dir/16
> RW>   ./libtool --debug --mode=link --tag=CC qcc -V3.3.5,gcc_ntox86 -O3 \
> RW>             -funroll-all-loops -o libconv.la \
> RW>             1/a.lo 2/a.lo 3/a.lo 4/a.lo 5/a.lo libc0.la
>
> There is no tests/testsuite.dir/16 directory. I've 15, 17, 26, 35, 38, 
> 68, 74 only. What do I need to create it ?

I meant 15.  Sorry for the typo.

> RW> 2) Failure test:
>
> RW> does this work on your system?
> RW>   echo 'int not_main () { return 0; }' > a.c
> RW>   qcc -V3.3.5,gcc_ntox86 -O3 -funroll-all-loops -c a.c
> RW>   qcc -V3.3.5,gcc_ntox86 -O3 -funroll-all-loops -o a a.o
> RW>   echo $?
> RW>   ls -l a
>
> Yes, it works. Reporting 0 as exit code and: ls -l a reports:
>
> -rwxrwxr-x  1 root    root        4110    Jan 27 08:13    a
>
> ldd /ports/temp/libtool-2.2.6-qnx/a
>
> /ports/temp/libtool-2.2.6-qnx/a
> libc.so.2 => /usr/lib/ldqnx.so.2 (0xb0300000)

Argh.  What happens if you try to execute it?
  ./a; echo $?

> Is test code also contains 'int not_main () { return 0; }' as C code to  
> compile and link ?

Yes, this is similar to the Failure test.

Thanks,
Ralf