Re: [PATCH 1/4] Support GCC LTO on GNU/Linux.

[Dave Korn]

On 06/04/2010 22:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 04:01 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> >     As for whether it would get dropped if you did, I'd imagine
>>> that's quite
>>> >  plausible; you might want to add a volatile qualifier.
>> 'static volatile const char * MAGIC = ...'
>>          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> err...maybe just 'volatile'!
> 
> Volatile const _does_ make sense to the compiler, believe it or not. :-)

  Yep, that was no typo on my part, I meant exactly what I said :)

    cheers,
      DaveK