[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool versioning
From: |
Peter Rosin |
Subject: |
Re: libtool versioning |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 20:41:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
Den 2010-05-04 20:00 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Errrm, is that really so? I tend to agree with Jef here...
I take it that your response is to my "... it will work" sentence, not
the paragraph below that.
Ah, indeed.
The algorithm *could* be interpreted such that e.g. the interface change
"int foo(void)" -> "int foo(int)" is an interface addition of int foo(int)
and an interface remove of int foo(void), thus triggering both #5 and #6.
But in that case "changed" need not be mentioned in #4 either. So, because
"changed" is mentioned in #4, it also needs to be explicitly mentioned
in #6.
Ah, ok. Yes, you're right. Feel free to commit a patch to
s/removed/& or changed/ in 6.
I've pushed the attached patch...
Cheers,
Peter
2010-05-05 Peter Rosin <address@hidden>
Clarify versioning algorithm documentation.
* doc/libtool.texi (Updating version info): Be explicit
about setting age to zero on interface change.
Reported by Jef Driesen <address@hidden>
--
They are in the crowd with the answer before the question.
> Why do you dislike Jeopardy?
clarify-version-alg.patch
Description: Text document