[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autobuild logs for Libtool
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: autobuild logs for Libtool |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:04:18 +0700 |
Hallo Ralf,
On 23 Aug 2010, at 01:38, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:50:55PM CEST:
>> I think Libtool should use Autobuild, <http://josefsson.org/autobuild/>,
>> for testing, and developers as well as users should be encouraged to
>> send results to the gathering site. It's about time I try to get my
>> various build setups sorted out in some manner suitable for that.
>
> OK to commit?
My other comments on this thread notwithstanding, please go ahead...
if you have time and inclination to automate the setting of autobuild_mode
per those other comments before you push, so much the better.
> The AB_INIT invocation causes something like this extra info to appear
> in the configure output:
>
> configure: autobuild project... GNU Libtool
> configure: autobuild revision... 2.2.11a (1.3227 2010-08-09)
is it about time we started using git-version-gen instead of our crazy
CVS version number faking script?
I'll do this before the pending release if you'd like.
> configure: autobuild hostname... fuchs
> configure: autobuild mode... default
> configure: autobuild timestamp... 20100822T183040Z
>
> When you don't have autobuild installed, thus AB_INIT not defined,
> the patch should be a no-op. autobuild will still be usable without
> the above output, it's just that the developer then needs to explicitly
> provide the information as command-line arguments to autobuild.
>
> I'd rather avoid adding libltdl/m4/autobuild.m4 to our git, that might
> introduce version conflicts in the future.
Agreed.
>
> A better long-term solution would be to start using gnulib-tool (for
> argz, autobuild, maybe eventually bootstrap),
Ack.
> but I *really* don't want
> to start experimenting with that option before the release.
Strongly agreed!
> configure: use Autobuild AB_INIT if available.
>
> * configure.ac: Call AB_INIT if it is defined, with
> $autobuild_mode as argument, to be set at configure time.
> Set AB_VERSION to the Libtool version string.
> * HACKING: Update.
> * libltdl/m4/.gitignore: Ignore autobuild.m4.
Cheers,
--
Gary V. Vaughan (address@hidden)
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Next Libtool Point Release Pending, (continued)
- Re: Next Libtool Point Release Pending, Gary V . Vaughan, 2010/08/09
- Re: Next Libtool Point Release Pending, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/08/09
- Re: Next Libtool Point Release Pending, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/08/09
- Re: Next Libtool Point Release Pending, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/09
- autobuild logs for Libtool (was: Next Libtool Point Release Pending), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/09
- Re: autobuild logs for Libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/22
- proposed autobuild_mode naming scheme (was: autobuild logs for Libtool), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/22
- Re: proposed autobuild_mode naming scheme (was: autobuild logs for Libtool), Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/08/22
- Re: proposed autobuild_mode naming scheme (was: autobuild logs for Libtool), Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/08/22
- Re: proposed autobuild_mode naming scheme, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/29
- Re: autobuild logs for Libtool,
Gary V. Vaughan <=
- Re: autobuild logs for Libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/23
- Re: Next Libtool Point Release Pending, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/08/09
- [PATCH] Autotest 2.62 bug?, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/08/09
- Re: [PATCH] Autotest 2.62 bug?, Eric Blake, 2010/08/09
- [PATCH] Make testsuite compatible with Autoconf 2.62 again., Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/08/10
- Re: Next Libtool Point Release Pending, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/08/06
- Re: [RFT PATCH v4 0/8] Sysroot series, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/08/03
Re: [RFT PATCH v4 0/8] Sysroot series, Charles Wilson, 2010/08/01