[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries
From: |
Peter Rosin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:26:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 |
On 2012-09-19 09:31, Peter Rosin wrote:
> * tests/runpath-in-lalib.at: Make sure shared libraries are created
> on Windows by passing -no-undefined. Otherwise libb.la fails to record
> a dependency on liba.la, and the final link of the program then fails
> with undefined symbols.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <address@hidden>
> ---
> tests/runpath-in-lalib.at | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> Ok to push?
> Or maybe the failure is deeper than this? Should libb.la record a
> dependency on liba.la even if libb.la is static only?
>
> The relevant difference in libb.la with this patch is this (I have
> elided changes to dlopen and library_names which are empty when
> no shared library is built):
>
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> inherited_linker_flags=''
>
> # Libraries that this one depends upon.
> -dependency_libs='
> -R/home/peda/libtool/git/cygwin/tests/testsuite.dir/047/foobar '
> +dependency_libs='
> -R/home/peda/libtool/git/cygwin/tests/testsuite.dir/047/foobar
> /home/peda/libtool/git/cygwin/tests/testsuite.dir/047/liba.la'
>
> # Names of additional weak libraries provided by this library
> weak_library_names=''
I likely is deeper, it seems this is a regression since 2.4.2.
Cheers,
Peter
- [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries, Peter Rosin, 2012/09/19
- Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries,
Peter Rosin <=
- Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries, Peter Rosin, 2012/09/19
- Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries, Gary V. Vaughan, 2012/09/19
- Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries, Peter Rosin, 2012/09/19
- Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries, Gary V. Vaughan, 2012/09/21
- Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries, Peter Rosin, 2012/09/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries, Peter Rosin, 2012/09/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries, Gary V. Vaughan, 2012/09/28
- Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries, Gary V. Vaughan, 2012/09/26
Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries, Roumen Petrov, 2012/09/19