[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libtool drops -static from LDFLAGS?
From: |
Ossama Othman |
Subject: |
Re: Libtool drops -static from LDFLAGS? |
Date: |
Wed, 9 May 2001 08:47:47 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
Hi Alexandre,
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 03:55:36PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 8, 2001, Ossama Othman <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Right, but the problem is that is it prevents users who "know what
> > they're doing" from using gcc's "-static" option.
>
> Nope. -all-static does that. It's in the libtool manual. If they
> ``know what they're doing'', they should know that :-D
I understand that, but why should a user who downloads a libtoolized
package have to read the libtool manual, especially since passing in
gcc's "-static" flag via $LDFLAGS is not an uncommon thing to do.
That behavior is now changed due to libtool's own "-static" flag
conflicting with gcc's "-static" flag.
-Ossama
--
Ossama Othman <address@hidden>
Distributed Object Computing Laboratory, Univ. of California at Irvine
1024D/F7A394A8 - 84ED AA0B 1203 99E4 1068 70E6 5EB7 5E71 F7A3 94A8