[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts)
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts) |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:23:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.21i |
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:52:10PM -0500, address@hidden wrote:
> In libltdl/ltdl.c from 1.4.1 foreach_dirinpath calls:
> if (argzize_path (canonical, &argz, &argz_len) != 0)
> goto cleanup;
> when argz_len is defined as an int and further on it has:
> {
> char *dir_name = 0;
> while ((dir_name = argz_next (argz, argz_len, dir_name)))
>
> yet, both argzize_path and argz_next expect argz_len to be size_t.
> Should argz_len be modified so it's a size_t?
Yes it should. Thanks. Applied.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())____
/ )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \' `&
`(_~)_ Tech' Author http://sources.redhat.com/autobook =`---d__/
- ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), libtool, 2001/09/05
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts),
Gary V. Vaughan <=
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Gary V. Vaughan, 2001/09/06
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), libtool, 2001/09/06
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Tim Mooney, 2001/09/07
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Gary V. Vaughan, 2001/09/07
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Robert Collins, 2001/09/08
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Bruce Korb, 2001/09/08
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Gary V. Vaughan, 2001/09/10
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Bruce Korb, 2001/09/10
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Gary V. Vaughan, 2001/09/10
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Tim Mooney, 2001/09/11