[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Version numbering
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: Version numbering |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:51:45 -0500 (CDT) |
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> I think when we branch for a release (say the upcoming 1.6), version numbers
> in the branch should continue to be "1.6.<micro><alpha>?", but that the trunk
> should bump its minor number to make it clear the trunk is very different to
> the stable branch: "1.7<alpha>?". We would of course continue to use "odd"
> letters for CVS revisions, and "even" letters for alpha releases.
Bumping the number to the next planned release level seems like the
usual practice to me.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V . Vaughan, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Daniel Reed, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Paul Jarc, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Bernd Jendrissek, 2003/09/30
- RE: Version numbering, Howard Chu, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Scott James Remnant, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Dalibor Topic, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30