[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: exclusive static or shared
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: exclusive static or shared |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:50:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
* Christopher Hulbert wrote on Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 12:28:59PM CET:
> On 2/15/06, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> > --tag=disable-shared
> > --tag=disable-static
> > - These flags need to go before the compiler: speaking in Automake
> > terms, they would fit in LIBTOOLFLAGS but not in LDFLAGS.
> The LIBTOOLFLAGS is the variable I was looking for! Of course tag's
> don't work in LDFLAGS because they come after the compiler (another
> shot at the problem I took). I will try setting LIBTOOLFLAGS later
> today.
Of course, as developer, you should be using AM_LIBTOOLFLAGS instead of
LIBTOOLFLAGS; the latter is again reserved for the user.
Cheers,
Ralf
- exclusive static or shared, Christopher Hulbert, 2006/02/14
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/15
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Christopher Hulbert, 2006/02/15
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/15
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Christopher Hulbert, 2006/02/15
- Message not available
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Christopher Hulbert, 2006/02/15
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/17
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Christopher Hulbert, 2006/02/17
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/17
- Re: exclusive static or shared,
Ralf Wildenhues <=