[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?
From: |
Bernd Jendrissek |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed? |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:47:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:42:54PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
> but why would you ever want to build libbfd shared? It is always
> built static by default even on ELF systems
Hmm, not on my system. It's shared here. And a good thing too, as I
don't want a trillion megabytes of --enable-targets=all libbfd
statically linked into all of ld, nm, strings, objdump, objcopy, and
whatever others I forget right now.
- --
There is a lot of food in a supermarket, too, but a supermarket isn't
the best place to hold a dinner party. -- Christopher Faylor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGB5bEwyMv24BBd/gRAuSzAJ98pyX6EuhiA+wY9so0UNBxzFhpVgCgmB2A
cHP8hEbD7BU/ibCDoBu8Jyo=
=dUA2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----