[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool woes
From: |
Ozkan Sezer |
Subject: |
Re: libtool woes |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:29:42 +0300 |
On 9/10/13, Peter Rosin <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2013-09-10 15:00, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On 9/10/13, Peter Rosin <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On 2013-09-10 12:52, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>>> That effectively cripples libtool for cross-compilers. Can the behavior
>>>> be refined instead? Can you contact Charles Wilson about this?
>>>
>>> He should be reading this list, if he has time...
>>>
>>> Anyway, does this work?
>>>
>>
>> No, it does not. With this patch applied, I see
>> sys_lib_search_path_spec="/opt/W64_180676/lib/gcc "
>> .. in the libtool --config output.
>
> Crap, I didn't do any final test and managed to exclude a couple
> of critical changes, and I did a couple of silly mistakes too. Sorry
> about that. Attached is what I should have sent the first time...
>
Thanks, this one makes it to work. ./libtool --config output now has:
sys_lib_search_path_spec="/opt/W64_180676/lib/gcc
/opt/W64_180676/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib64 /opt/cross_win64/mingw/lib64
/opt/W64_180676/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib /opt/cross_win64/mingw/lib "
which is suitable.
>> (Note that, this is not a multilib compiler: it targets only win64.)
>
> Even so, I believe that it outputs ../lib64 when you
> -print-multi-os-directory, right?
>
Well yeah, it does :)
Is it hard to implement a way of directly respecting --print-search-dirs
output of the compiler though?
--
O.S.
- Re: libtool woes, (continued)
- Re: libtool woes, Ozkan Sezer, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Peter Rosin, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Ozkan Sezer, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Peter Rosin, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Ozkan Sezer, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Peter Rosin, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Ozkan Sezer, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Peter Rosin, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Ozkan Sezer, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Peter Rosin, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes,
Ozkan Sezer <=
- Re: libtool woes, Peter Rosin, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Ozkan Sezer, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Peter Rosin, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Peter Rosin, 2013/09/11
- Re: libtool woes, Ozkan Sezer, 2013/09/11
- Re: libtool woes, Ozkan Sezer, 2013/09/17
- Re: libtool woes, Peter Rosin, 2013/09/17
- Re: libtool woes, Peter Rosin, 2013/09/17
- Re: libtool woes, Ozkan Sezer, 2013/09/10
- Re: libtool woes, Ozkan Sezer, 2013/09/10