libunwind-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Libunwind-devel] Time Cost of Libunwind is too expensive.


From: Chenggang
Subject: Re: [Libunwind-devel] Time Cost of Libunwind is too expensive.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:57:18 +0800 (CST)

Hi Vladimir:
I used libunwind for sampling. The APIs I used are same of perf. I think these APIs is an inefficient way. They must access the target program's binary file. Although I used DSO cache like perf.
If there a more efficient way, maybe I can modify perf use my spare time.

Regards
Chenggang
3x





At 2014-11-24 15:23:17, "Vladimir Nikulichev" <address@hidden> wrote: >Hi Chenggang, > >Do you use libunwind for either sampling or one-shot stack tracing? >For sampling Perf Events interface can be helpful for you. > >For one shot have a look at this tool: https://github.com/tbricks/tbstack >Some numbers on Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz, for one thread: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/libunwind-devel/2014-10/msg00008.html >Note that I measured time to freeze process and collect data, unwinding is completed afterwards. > >— >Vladimir > >> On 22 Nov 2014, at 12:05, Chenggang <address@hidden> wrote: >> >> Hi: >> I am a user of libunwind. I am developing a profiling system, "Bianque". >> I use libunwind to unwind the stack on the target machine. But the time cost is too expensive. >> While the layers of call chain is 130 and the stack size is 1MB, we need 3.8 milliseconds to unwind it. >> My CPU is Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430 0 @ 2.20GHz. >> Is this cost normal? >> >> Regards >> Chenggang >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Libunwind-devel mailing list >> address@hidden >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel >



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]