|
From: | Lassi Tuura |
Subject: | Re: [Libunwind-devel] Libunwind reports the same ip and fp for Fortran code compiled with PGI |
Date: | Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:37:05 -0800 |
Thanks, adding this worked great on Linux, Do you know the equivalent section in a Mach-O binary (OSX) that needs to be present for libunwind to get the correct IP and FP (eh_frame_hdr does not appear to be present for gnu compiled binaries)?
- Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris January [mailto:address@hidden]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:45 AM
To: Scott Biersdorff
Cc: address@hidden; Juul VanderSpek
Subject: Re: [Libunwind-devel] Libunwind reports the same ip and fp for Fortran code compiled with PGI
Hello Scott,
The PGI compiled executable is missing the .eh_frame_hdr section. Try adding -Wl,--eh-frame-hdr to LDFLAGS in Makefile. This fixes the problem.
Regards,
Chris January - VP Engineering - Allinea Software Ltd.
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 22:02 +0000, Scott Biersdorff wrote:
> We are looking into an issue with libunwind where it reports the same
> address as both a IP and FP. This happens with a simple PGI compiled
> Fortran example. This same example compiled with gfortran reports
> different addresses:
>
>
>
> ./fortran-standalone.gnu.exe
>
> ip= 0x0000000000400b19 fp= 0x0000000000400aff
>
> ip= 0x0000000000400a45 fp= 0x000000000040098d
>
> ip= 0x0000000000400aa4 fp= 0x0000000000400a82
>
> ip= 0x0000000000400af8 fp= 0x0000000000400ac4
>
> ip= 0x00007f43bad53ec5 fp= 0x00007f43bad53dd0
>
> ip= 0x00000000004008c9 fp= 0x00000000004008a0
>
>
>
> ./fortran-standalone.pgi.exe
>
> ip= 0x00000000004027eb fp= 0x00000000004027eb
>
> ip= 0x00000000004027b0 fp= 0x00000000004027b0
>
> ip= 0x0000000000402712 fp= 0x0000000000402712
>
> ip= 0x00000000004026c4 fp= 0x00000000004026c4
>
>
>
> (Note that both stacks run into strange addresses unknown in the
> object file; my suspicion is that these are trampoline functions
> somewhere on stack or heap).
>
>
>
> I’ve attached the sources and binaries for this example. Can you help
> us understand what is particular about this binary compiled by PGI
> that causes this? Is there another way to retrieve the function
> pointer?
_______________________________________________
Libunwind-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |