lightning
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lightning] pussycat


From: Leslie Randall
Subject: [Lightning] pussycat
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:43:07 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)


This action is now a PicoComponent, honouring constructor based dependency injection.
Before I delve into the details, let me recap some simple mock essentials. Or is it your belief that your free speech is worth others' loss? Get your brushes and submit your art!
At least at the time of the invention of the antipattern. So we can mock IDEA in IDEA?
Paul and I started it right after I moved to London to start working for ThoughtWorks. About a week after we started Bob was kind enough to lend us a space for our new little baby, and that's when we named it PicoContainer.
-Like always doing the simplest thing and continuosly refactor the code. saveCheese method will hit the database.
It all started when I asked Paul one night whether he had heard of Inversion of Control. saveCheese method will hit the database.
Before I delve into the details, let me recap some simple mock essentials. This can incur some percieved overhead in the codebase, as the developer will now have to maintain both a CheeseDao and a HibernateCheeseDao.
The team's established practice is to extend the action and override methods that use objects that we want to mock out. If your test is too complicated, you're not doing it right. You write exactly what makes the test pass.
That would have been absolutely impossible without the extensive test suite we had built up by then.
About a week after we started Bob was kind enough to lend us a space for our new little baby, and that's when we named it PicoContainer. Another good reason to use them - and TDD in general - is to let good designs emerge more easily. He also seems to ignore the benefits of TDD. The derived "mock" implementation within the test may not be overriding anything in the superclass anymore, and the test may fail to execute the methods originally intended.
You write exactly what makes the test pass. Paul and I started it right after I moved to London to start working for ThoughtWorks.
Calling the CheeseDao.
Post-testing and post-mocking is actually quite evil. Its class is generally an implementation of an interface or a subclass of some class, either generated dynamically or statically coded. The tiger gave up roughly after twenty days and left the cave. Paul and I started it right after I moved to London to start working for ThoughtWorks.
saveCheese method will hit the database. Check out QDox Attributes! The test fixture should be simple and the assertions few. He also seems to ignore the benefits of TDD.
The tiger gave up roughly after twenty days and left the cave. Or is it your belief that your free speech is worth others' loss?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]