[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lightning] Broken jump patching on x86_64
From: |
Pippijn van Steenhoven |
Subject: |
Re: [Lightning] Broken jump patching on x86_64 |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jun 2008 01:29:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:11:02PM -0700, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> What happens if you:
>
> 1) add a "memset (&as, 0, sizeof (as));"
That fixes it.. stupid of me not to think of that one.
> 2) change _jit's definition to "(as.current)" with parentheses?
That doesn't matter. The parentheses are optional since the member access
operator has highest precedence.
Thanks,
--
Pippijn van Steenhoven
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Lightning] Broken jump patching on x86_64, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 2008/06/08
- [Lightning] Re: Broken jump patching on x86_64, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 2008/06/08
- Re: [Lightning] Broken jump patching on x86_64, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/06/08
- Re: [Lightning] Broken jump patching on x86_64,
Pippijn van Steenhoven <=
- Re: [Lightning] Broken jump patching on x86_64, Laurent Michel, 2008/06/11
- [Lightning] Re: Broken jump patching on x86_64, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/06/11
- Re: [Lightning] Re: Broken jump patching on x86_64, Laurent Michel, 2008/06/11
- Re: [Lightning] Re: Broken jump patching on x86_64, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/06/11
- Re: [Lightning] Re: Broken jump patching on x86_64, Laurent Michel, 2008/06/11
- Re: [Lightning] Re: Broken jump patching on x86_64, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/06/11