lilypond-auto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lilypond-auto] Issue 3253 in lilypond: NR 3.3.2, Using tags: add a warn


From: lilypond
Subject: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3253 in lilypond: NR 3.3.2, Using tags: add a warning about the use of \relative with \tag
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:55:44 +0000

Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Documentation

New issue 3253 by address@hidden: NR 3.3.2, Using tags: add a warning about the use of \relative with \tag
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3253

Reported by Trevor here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2013-03/msg00069.html

It refers to a discussion on lilypond-user:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-03/msg00772.html

David pointed out:

"\relative is a music function that leaves behind absolute music.
So if you have

melody = \relative { ... \tag ... \tag ... }

then \melody contains only absolute music and

  \removeWithTag #'xxx \melody

will work fine.  If you do

\relative \removeWithTag ...

then things will go haywire as \relative will now be run on already
reduced music.  So as long as you apply \relative before removing
tagged/untagged music, you should get consistent results."

Trevor proposed to add a warning in NR 3.3.2, Using tags:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source#using-tags


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]