Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3992 in lilypond: Using dodecaphonic and dodecaphonic-no-repeat there is no difference

[lilypond]

Comment #2 on issue 3992 by address@hidden: Using dodecaphonic and  
dodecaphonic-no-repeat there is no difference
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3992

That fixes the problem.

I can make a patch for it.  While I'm at it, I'd like to go over the code  
for dodecaphonic-no-repeat.

The description says that accidentals are reckoned by _voice_.  The  
behavior in the documentation (i.e., when it was working) was by _staff_.   
Thus, the cross-staff C#4 in the first measure left hand received an  
accidental, but the half note C#4 got no accidental.

Attached is an image which is consistent with the comments on the code.  Of  
course, the accidental on the C#4 half-note looks fussy.  Should that be  
removed as well?  (The downstemmed C#5 in the second measure would lose its  
accidental if this change were incorporated.)

Attachments:
        no-repeat-dodecaphonic.png  93.7 KB

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings