lilypond-auto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #3208 Wrong Mu


From: Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto
Subject: [Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #3208 Wrong MultiMeasureRest glyph
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:25:55 -0000

I changed my mind: Allowing shorter rests doesn’t harm—no one has to use positive numbers in usable-duration-logs but if someone really wants to do it even though Gould et al. disadvise, we shouldn’t take away this functionality.

This also means that we don’t need such a boolean grob property: Instead you can just override usable-duration-logs to #'(0) as it has been done in every single discussion about this property that I could find on the internet. Yay, backwards-compatibility! ;)

Of course we could discuss whether it would be nice to have a shorthand like

modernMMRs = \override MultiMeasureRest.usable-duration-logs = #'(0)

next to compressFullBarRests and expandFullBarRests in ly/property-init.ly.

Concerning the default value of expand-limit: This doesn’t really belong here but would be another issue. I’ll send a feature request to the bug list for discussion.


[issues:#3208] Wrong MultiMeasureRest glyph

Status: Started
Created: Wed Feb 27, 2013 03:07 AM UTC by Anonymous
Last Updated: Thu Jan 11, 2018 09:53 AM UTC
Owner: Malte Meyn
Attachments:

Originally created by: *anonymous

Originally created by: address@hidden

Thomas Morley reported here:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2013-02/msg00180.html

as follows:

With measures longer than two whole notes LilyPond chooses different
glyphs for MultiMeasureRest.

\version "2.17.12"

\new Staff {
  \compressFullBarRests

  \time 7/4
  R1*7/4
  R1*7/4*2

  \break

  \time 9/4
  R1*9/4
  R1*9/4*2
  \break

  \time 18/4
  R1*18/4
  R1*18/4*2
}

Discussion on the user-list:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Glyph-for-longer-MultiMeasureRest-td141438.html

According to Gould LilyPond's default seems to be correct.
Werner objects.

At least there's need for discussion, I think.

Attached an image showing "LilyPond's default" vs "Correct?"

Regards,
  Harm


Sent from sourceforge.net because address@hidden is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]