[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile for lilypond
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: guile for lilypond |
Date: |
12 Sep 2001 18:42:55 +0200 |
"Gerrit P. Haase" <address@hidden> writes:
> I fetched your vesion of guile-1.4-1.
[For GNU/windows, I presume]
> It is not stripped:
> Is it a problem to strip it? Have I missed the point?
No problem to strip it. As far as I know, Guile is packaged simply by
doing `make install prefix=/tmp/somewhere', and rolling a tarball,
like all other packages.
So, it seems that the decision not to strip is made by the Guile
team, really.
> I have my own version and I'm looking forward to include it in the
> 'official' cygwin netrelease, once the no-new-package moratorium is
> lifted.
>
> Any objections if I take over the mantenance of guile?
No, that would be nice. To be fair, maintaining the Windows
distribution and binaries is a pain for us, non-windows developers.
Are you a LilyPond user? Don't hesitate to ask the same for LilyPond
herself :-)
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- guile for lilypond, Gerrit P. Haase, 2001/09/12
- Re: guile for lilypond,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=