[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tab
From: |
Lamy Jean-Baptiste |
Subject: |
Re: tab |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Sep 2002 16:14:29 +0200 |
David and Rune, what do you think of the Han-Wen's proposition (Identifying
strings by their note name) ?
If you are right, i'll work on it in about 2 weeks (after my exams).
Jiba
> > > strings by notenames:
> > >
> > > e4-c
> >
> > That's what I like, but many have more than one of a given name,
> > which makes an arbitrary 1-9 a-z a better choice. Many
> > instruments, actually all of them with only 3 strings, have two
> > strings tuned to the exact same note.
>
> The higher string could use the pitch with octavation quote; that is
> consistent with the rest of lily
>
> > > would be the E played on the C string. In this way, the string
> > > designations are independent of other strings that are added or
> > > removed, and fingerings are independent of the tablature.
> >
> > That would be g'^4-e or g'^4-1 or g'^4-m where m is for mi, since
> > the guitar has two E strings. ^4 is in the notation and 3 is in
> > the tablature. ^4 is a fingering indication, 3 is the fret the
> > note is on. Not independent. Not the same thing.
>
> Yes, but you can use them both, that's what I mean with independent.
>
> > As I posted long ago, English lute tab used abcdefghi... instead of
> > 0123456789 10 11 12... for frets. That also could be settable:
>
> This a different topic, and IIRC lily can already produce letters for
> frets.
- Re: tab,
Lamy Jean-Baptiste <=
- Re: tab, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/09/06