[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improved lilypond-book.py
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: improved lilypond-book.py |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:32:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>> The glossary is not part of the info documentation. Should we include
>> it in the lilypond manual, eg, as an appendix, or should we rename it
>> (ie: lilypond-glossary, musical-glossary), and install it separately?
>
> I think that music-glossary is a better name. I think it should not be
> part of the manual itself, as a large part of it is about
> music-theoretical concepts, which have no direct connection with
> Lily.
Ok, if not part of the manual, something like the music- prefix is
necessary. I'll have a look. If the name changes, we'll have to
trick something to keep external links to the document working.
> Hyperlinks are ok, of course, but we should have a macro to
> prevent the unreadable texinfo references showing up in the printed
> edition.
Ok, I'll check. Should we contact/ask/notify Christian before making
macro and hyperlink changes?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org