[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch; scm/music-types.scm
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: patch; scm/music-types.scm |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:51:12 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> > 2. To top that it would be nice to have syntax descriptions for all music
> > things (just how it is entered, not so much how to use it, that's a
> > job for a user manual), so that we always have a generated "reference
> > manual" for the input syntax.
>
> Gulp. Maybe I should have stuck to the user manual.
Don't worry, you'll be fine. At worst you'll some more about how lily
works from the inside :-)
> I was wondering about that... _can_ I reference specific parts
> of the user manual from scm/music-types? So far I've just
> said "see user manual", but having a link (in the html version)
> would be nicer.
I've added @usermanref{} and @glossaryref{} (the latter needs revision
since the glossary doesn't use nodes, but the file will compile)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen