[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: deleting files in input/test
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: deleting files in input/test |
Date: |
11 Jun 2003 13:42:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> OK, I think I see the point now. We'll keep it, although I'll probably
> change the filename (if only to write out "autochange-extra-voice.ly")
That's better in any case.
> But I'd just to make sure I'm doing the right thing: as far as I
> understand, input/test is supposed to be examples to demonstrate tricky
> things you can do with Lilypond. input/regression is supposed to be for
> code snippets which "test" new version of Lilypond to make sure they do
> everything they're supposed to.
Yes. That's how it is supposed to be.
> While I'm looking at an input/test file, currently I only look at
> whether that file demonstrates something useful for an end-user. I
> don't try to judge whether the file is useful in regression testing; in
> part because I thought that was what input/regression was for, but
> mainly because I don't know enough about Lilypond internals (or
> engraving, for that matter -- I didn't know that the beams needed to be
> horizontal) to judge whether or not it's a useful regression test.
That's part of the problem: regtest snippets should be short, test
just one feature, and describe what the test is about; what you should
see.
> (sometimes I'll mark a file as "delete or move to regression"; I don't
> _totally_ ignore the usefulness of a code snippet in regression testing)
>
> Is this what I should be doing? I'll never delete a file without asking
> if it's ok on the mailist, so if a file is needed for regression, somebody
> can tell me and it'll get moved instead of deleted.
Yes, I'm quite happy that you help sorting out the cruft.
> > > > beam-pos.ly
>
> When you say "keep it", do you mean "keep it in input/test", or "move
> it to input/regression and keep it there"?
> (or even "move it to input/bugs and keep it there")
Sorry. Move to regtest in this case. This file does not show a trick.
> > > > beam-second.ly
>
> Should we move it to regression?
Yes.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org